This edition of the digest considers one judgment of the Supreme Court, two of the Court of Appeal, and two of the High Court. In Sutherland v HM Advocate the Supreme...
This week's edition considers one judgment of the Supreme Court and two of the High Court. In Serafin v Malkiewicz the Supreme Court considered whether a judge’s interventions during the cross-examination of an...
This week's edition considers one judgment of the Supreme Court and three of the High Court. In R v Adams the Supreme Court considered whether the Secretary of State had to personally...
This week’s edition considers one judgment of the Supreme Court, four of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), and two of the Divisional Court. In AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State...
This week's edition considers two judgments from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). In Abbott and others the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) gave guidance as to how to calculate the appropriate...
This week's edition considers one judgment of the Divisional Court. In Re Ojebode the Court considered an application for a certificate of inadequacy under section 83 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988....
This week's edition considers one judgment from the Supreme Court and two from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). In Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department the Supreme Court...
This week’s edition considers one judgment from the Supreme Court, one from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and one from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). In Copeland, the Supreme...
This week’s edition considers two judgments of the Court of Appeal and one of the Divisional Court. In R v Ngoie the Court considered an appeal against conviction. The primary issue considered...
This week’s edition considers one judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, one of the Supreme Court and one of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). In Guaghran v UK the...