This week’s edition considers one judgment from the Supreme Court, three judgments from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), two judgments from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) and one...
This week's edition contains two judgments of the Divisional Court and one of the Crown Court. In Director of the Serious Fraud Office v Airbus SE the Crown Court approved...
This week's edition contains two judgments from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), one from the Divisional Court and one from the magistrates' courts. In Reece the Court of Appeal dismissed an...
This week’s edition considers three judgments from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). In Thomas the Court of Appeal considers an appeal against conviction principally based on the judge's decision to reserve...
This week's edition considers seven judgments: five from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), one from the Divisional Court and one from the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. In Abdurahman the Court of Appeal considered ...
This week’s edition considers one judgment of the Court of Appeal. In R. v McCarthy (Brendan Patrick) the Court considered an appeal against a sentence imposed following the appellant’s plea of guilty...
This week’s edition considers four judgments; two of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), and two of the Divisional Court. In Reynolds the Court of Appeal considered the proper approach to summing-up and...
This week’s digest considers four judgments; one of the Supreme Court, two of the Court of Appeal, and one of the Divisional Court. In R v TRA the Supreme Court interpreted the...
This week's edition considers five judgments, one from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), one from the Court Martial Appeal Court and three from the Divisional Court. In Jones and Miszczak the...
This week’s edition considers two judgments from the Divisional Court. In Adamescu v Bucharest Appeal Court Criminal Division, Romania the Divisional Court granted the requested person permission to appeal against his extradition on...