This week's edition considers one judgment from the Supreme Court and two from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). In Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department the Supreme Court...
This week’s edition considers one judgment from the Supreme Court, three judgments from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), two judgments from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) and one...
This week’s digest considers four judgments; one of the Supreme Court, two of the Court of Appeal, and one of the Divisional Court. In R v TRA the Supreme Court interpreted the...
This week's Digest considers three judgments: one of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and two of the Divisional Court In Pringle the Court of Appeal considered the safety of the appellant's...
This week’s edition considers seven judgments; two of the Supreme Court, one of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and four of the High Court. In Routier and another v Commissioners...
This week’s digest considers five judgments; two of the Supreme Court, two of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and one of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). In R (Miller)...
This week’s Digest considers three judgments. In R (Privacy International) the Supreme Court assessed whether an ouster clause shielding the Investigatory Powers Tribunal from judicial review was effective. In Kuddus the...
This week’s Digest considers six judgments, one from the Supreme Court and five from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). In Konecny, the Supreme Court considered whether an individual who had...
This week’s Digest considers four judgments, two of the Supreme Court and two of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). The first Supreme Court judgment addresses the legality of the...
This week’s Digest contains one judgment from the Supreme Court and three from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). The first considers whether the UK’s extended determinate sentence regime is...